Canadian Lawyer Slams Chequered Justice!

On 26th July 2014, the following review was posted on a well known audiobook download site by someone simply calling himself “Paul from Ontario, Canada”…  

But was this a genuine review?  

Let me be very clear…. I’m not for one moment suggesting that this was a sneaky, insidious, underhand attempt by powerful lawyers, working stealthily behind the scenes for the insurance industry, to cunningly derail Leslie Phillips new audiobook… but just try Googling Paul from Ontario, Canada, Lawyer Profiles and see what comes up.  Interestingly,  “Paul” appears to be a barrister and partner in a large, rather powerful Canadian law firm acting for major insurance corporations!

Was there an ulterior motive in placing this review?  Perhaps he  just likes listening to legal thrillers (or not in this case), anyway, you decide… 

Paul’s review, mistakenly citing a “Mr. Barrett” as the author of Chequered Justice,  begins: 

“Not even a brilliant narrator can save this” 

“Paul from Ontario, Canada” says: 

No one familiar with the law could possibly get over the many legal errors.  A trial judge who participated in pre trial hearings, who questions the accused’s right to legal aid was bad but when he issues an injunction banning the airing of a TV show without being asked, without notice to the broadcaster I could take no more.  I trust Mr. Barrett never went on the race track without having his car checked by a mechanic. Why would he write a book about the law without having a lawyer check it for flaws.”

Screen Shot 2014-08-28 at 20.49.37

Listen to the Chapter that so outraged Paul from Ontario, Canada:

Answers to Paul’s comments:

  • “Paul from Ontario, Canada comments”: “Why would he write a book about the law without having a lawyer check it for flaws.”
  • A: Chequered Justice was initially reviewed by one of the UK’s top barristers, Michael Mansfield QC, prior to it’s release.  Michael Mansfield was fully acquainted with the real case as it was he that had attempted to get it back before the Court of Appeal in 1997… 

Screen Shot 2014-08-29 at 14.05.11

Chequered Justice has, since then, been positively reviewed by many other legal professionals (Review below is from a French Barrister):

Screen Shot 2014-08-29 at 14.14.50

scan0053_pixelised_highlighted…Furthermore, on 25th Aug 2014, the solicitor in my real case (Jonathan Stevens added this response to “Paul’s” comment: 

Screen Shot 2014-08-29 at 13.13.47

  • “Paul from Ontario, Canada comments”: “…an injunction banning the airing of a TV show without being asked, without notice to the broadcaster I could take no more.”
  • A: Yes, that also was bad, but again it actually happened in my case.   In reality, the real TV programme was ITV’s Dispatches, entitled: “Adding Insult to Injury” (listen to the episode below).  The episode was  due to have been screened by Channel 4 in September 1994, until blocked by my trial judge who issued an injunction preventing it’s broadcast until after my trial.

On 22nd August 2014 I made a Freedom of Information Request to release a copy of the injunction that “Paul” suggests couldn’t have been issued.  On 26th August I received this rather spooky “who are you?” reply:

Who are you

On the same day I replied, explaining who I was and pointing out that (according to the Crown Court Retention Schedule) the documentation is supposed to remain on file for 20 years:

 Just to clarify

The following day I received this final curt communication, saying “the injunction/contempt order had been destroyed”.  Whilst this email serves to prove the injunction WAS issued, it’s interesting to note the reference to a “contempt order” …  especially as I never mention the word “contempt” in my emails!  One might wonder where that came from if all the documentation was destroyed.  Listen carefully to the offending fictitious Chapter 13 above… it may lead one to the conclusion there was only one person who judged the matter to be contemptuous!  I’ll leave it to your own conclusions as to why the documentation was so suddenly destroyed, 3 weeks before it’s destruction deadline.    

We do not have it!

ITV Channel 4 couldn’t find a full playable tape of the banned Dispatches episode as after almost 20 years the picture quality had badly deteriorated…. however it’s audio track survived!  Now, thanks to the work of the sound engineer, Graham Waller, it’s been polished up and can be  listened to below.  This was the original sound track of the banned episode, intended for  broadcast in September 1994, as depicted in the fictitious Chequered Justice – Chapter 13.

I’m sure Paul’s review won’t exactly help distribution, however his unwitting “proof reading” of the legal proceedings simply adds credence to the injustice I and so many others have had to endure.  Paul appears to confuse the “manipulation” depicted in Chequered Justice with what he perceives to be flaws or textual errors…  in effect saying it couldn’t happen in real life.  He’s also managed to completely miss the subtle hints in the audiobooks sound track (e.g. at 4.23), signalling when a spot of “judicial tinkering” is taking place (have a listen to the offending chapter above)!  

Let me repeat what I have said before in my Authors Note (which I suspect Paul skipped)…Screen Shot 2014-08-29 at 14.10.28Please also see my blog and my Questions & Answers page: Note that whilst Chequered Justice had to be published as a fiction for legal reasons, everything that happened to “Will Middleton” happened to me… EVERYTHING This obviously includes the injunction banning the TV show and the way it was issued, “without being asked and without notice to the broadcaster” as depicted in Chapter 13 of Chequered Justice, as well as all the issues concerning my right to legal aid – See documents above in support of the truth.

Just one question for you, “Paul from Ontario, Canada”…

Shouldn’t a lawyer first listened to all the evidence before reaching a conclusion?

On 30th Aug I sent Paul the polite email below:

Dear Paul

 To date Paul has declined to reply!  

My family lived through the hellish reality behind Chequered Justice….  I recently found the quote below scribbled on the back of my sons door.  He’s now 27 but was just 7 years of age when we were raided “in error” by the Metropolitan Police…  

photo 5

As a lawyer representing the multi-million pound industry that so decimated our lives, you might like to reflect…

3 comments on “Canadian Lawyer Slams Chequered Justice!

  1. It just goes to show that some people choose to be blind rather than accept a truth.
    It is hard for doctors to believe another doctor can do harm….But there was Harold Shipman.
    It is hard for police officers to accept there are corrupt police. But there was Ali Dizaei…
    It is hard for Social workers to conceive of assisting in harming a child. But there was Baby P..
    It was hard for “The Establishment” to consider a Fellow was a spy. But there was Burgess, Maclean, etal.
    This lawyer comes from a position of having made his mind up prior to reading the book. Then he seeks to disavow the truth.
    I invite this Lawyer to contact either John or myself for a version of British Justice that would truly make him sick to his stomach.
    The pain and suffering innocent people endure for years after being persecuted in a British Court is unfathomable to some. Indescribably painful for John and myself who have experienced it first hand.

    I feel sorry for the clients of this lawyer who hides. For they seem bound to suffer the same fate of “Justice” Chequered, or not that results from closed unintelligent minds.

    He is sadly not a lone voice. there will always be the doubters.

    I know it is the truth. Just one person believing my story was enough for me to make it all worthwhile.

  2. Silence speaks volumes! It would have been nice if Paul had come back and commented after reading all the evidence submitted on this page 🙂

Leave a Reply to Jason Salliss Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.